Improving disclosure and consent: "is it safe?": new ethics for reporting personal exposures to environmental chemicals.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 17666695.
- Also identified by PMC identifier 1963285.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The recent flood of research concerning pollutants in personal environmental and biological samples-blood, urine, breastmilk, household dust and air, umbilical cord blood, and other media-raises questions about whether and how to report results to individual study participants. Clinical medicine provides an expert-driven framework, whereas community-based participatory research emphasizes participants' right to know and the potential to inform action even when health effects are uncertain. Activist efforts offer other models. We consider ethical issues involved in the decision to report individual results in exposure studies and what information should be included. Our discussion is informed by our experience with 120 women in a study of 89 pollutants in homes and by interviews with other researchers and institutional review board staff.
Medical subject headings
- Air Pollution, Indoor
- Biomarkers
- Decision Making
- Disclosure
- Environmental Exposure
- Ethics, Research
- Hazardous Substances
- Informed Consent