Long-term use of postmenopausal estrogen and progestin hormone therapies and the risk of endometrial cancer.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 17689625.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess whether endometrial cancer risk among long-term users of (1) sequential estrogen plus progestin 10-24 days per month exceeds that of nonusers and (2) daily estrogen plus progestin (continuous combined hormone therapy) is below that of nonusers. In this population-based case-control study with 1038 endometrial cancer cases diagnosed in 1985-1999 and 1453 control subjects, exclusive users of a single form of hormone therapy were compared with never users of hormone therapy. For sequential therapy, only long-term use (> or = 6 years) was associated with increased risk (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.5). Continuous combined therapy was associated with decreased risk (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.88), with no increased risk among long-term users (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.45-1.3). These results support the hypotheses that continuous combined therapy does not increase (and may decrease) endometrial cancer risk and that long-term sequential therapy can lead to a modest increased risk. However, the collective results of all studies of these questions and their clinical implications remain unclear.
Medical subject headings
- Endometrial Neoplasms
- Estrogen Replacement Therapy
- Estrogens
- Progestins