Prone positioning unloads the right ventricle in severe ARDS.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 17925425.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Despite airway pressure limitation, acute cor pulmonale persists in a minority of ARDS patients. Insufficient airway pressure limitation, hypercapnia, or both may be responsible. Because prone positioning (PP) has been shown to be a safe way to reduce airway pressure and to improve alveolar ventilation, we decided to assess its effect on right ventricular (RV) pressure overload in ARDS patients. Between January 1998 and December 2006, we studied 42 ARDS patients treated by PP to correct severe oxygenation impairment (Pao2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, <100 mm Hg). RV function was evaluated by bedside transesophageal echocardiography, before and after 18 h of prone-position ventilation. RV enlargement was measured by RV/left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic area ratio in the long axis. Septal dyskinesia was quantified by measuring short-axis systolic eccentricity of the LV. Before PP, 21 patients (50%) had acute cor pulmonale, defined by RV enlargement associated with septal dyskinesia (group 1), whereas 21 patients had a normal RV (group 2). PP was accompanied by a significant decrease in airway pressure and Paco2. In group 1, this produced a significant decrease in mean (+/-SD) RV enlargement (from 0.91+/-0.22 to 0.61+/-0.21) after 18 h of PP (p=0.000) and a significant reduction in mean septal dyskinesia (from 1.5+/-0.2 to 1.1+/-0.1) after 18 h of PP (p=0.000). In the most severe forms of ARDS, PP was an efficient means of controlling RV pressure overload.
Medical subject headings
- Prone Position
- Pulmonary Heart Disease
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Right