Efficacy of Viabahn in the treatment of severe superficial femoral artery lesions: which factors influence long-term patency?
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 17983772.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusive disease treatment by means of covered stents. retrospective. From 2000 to 2005, a Hemobahn/Viabahn endoprosthesis was implanted in 102 limbs (95 patients; mean age: 72.1 years, 52-94) for intermittent claudication (group I, n=50 limbs), critical (group II, n=32) or acute ischemia (group III, n=20). Lesions treated were Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) A (n=9) B (n=42), C (n=28) or D (n=23), associated with a good (2 or 3 leg arteries, n=60) or a poor (1 or 0 artery, n=42) runoff. The endograft was placed successfully in all cases, but 3 early deaths (3.2%) (1 in group II and 2 in group III), and 4 acute thromboses (4%) occurred. Primary and secondary actuarial patency rates were 97+/-1.7%, and 99+/-1% at 1 month, 74+/-4.8% & 84+/-4.1% at 1 year,and 71+/-9.5% & 79+/-8.5% at 3 years, after a mean follow-up of 30.2 months (1-60). Long-term primary and secondary patencies were significantly different between TASC Cand TASC D lesions (P<.004 & .001). Severity of lesions, rather than preoperative symptoms or runoff, is mainly to be considered before using Hemobahn/Viabahn endoprosthesis in severe SFA occlusive lesions.
Medical subject headings
- Arterial Occlusive Diseases
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis
- Femoral Artery
- Ischemia
- Stents
- Vascular Patency