Hybrid external fixation of proximal tibia fractures: biomechanical analysis of four commercial systems.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18198775.
- Also identified by DOI 10.3928/01477447-20071201-06.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare commercially available hybrid external fixator systems, mechanical testing was performed on fiberglass composite tibias with proximal metaphyseal fractures fixed with 4 hybrid systems (Ace-Fischer, Hoffmann II, Synthes Hybrid, and EBI DynaFix) and a custom "rigid" frame. The only significant difference between commercial systems was in axial loading where the Ace-Fischer allowed less motion than the other frames. In all cases the "rigid" reference frame allowed significantly less motion than the commercial systems. Approximately 50% of the motion comes from frame deformation and 50% from deformation of the pins and wires.
Medical subject headings
- External Fixators
- Fracture Fixation
- Tibial Fractures
Anatomy
- tibia