Is video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy better? Quality of life considerations.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18222204.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.09.056.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy has controversial advantages over traditional open surgical approaches. Subjective concerns such as pain, dyspnea, physical functioning, and overall satisfaction generally favor VATS but vary depending on survey timing. Independence, a major quality of life component, favors video-assisted thoracic surgery because fewer objective hospital and discharge resources are needed because pulmonary function, activity level, muscle strength, and walking capacity are better. Video-assisted thoracic surgery often hastens return to work and facilitates adjuvant chemotherapy or subsequent urgent surgical procedures. Video-assisted thoracic surgery-related quality of life benefits are amplified by advanced age (or other frailties) and reduced by advanced cancer stage or comorbid illness.
Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
- Pneumonectomy
- Quality of Life
- Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted