Upper-pole puncture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective review of treatment safety and efficacy.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18257858.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07388.x.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To review the safety and efficacy of supracostal puncture during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for renal calculi. Over a 12-year period, 66 patients had either an upper-pole puncture alone or combined with middle- or lower-pole puncture during PCNL for renal calculi. All punctures were made by an experienced uroradiologist and were either supra- or subcostal. We retrospectively reviewed all case notes and radiographs to determine stone-clearance rates and complications associated with the site and number of punctures. There was an overall stone-free rate of 78% with upper-pole puncture alone or combined with middle- or lower-pole puncture. There was a 3% thoracic complication rate with upper pole punctures, and an overall complication rate of 30% for both thoracic and non-thoracic complications. Upper-pole puncture in PCNL is associated with minimum morbidity if done by an experienced urologist or radiologist. The stone-free rate appears to be more dependent on stone size and complexity than the site of puncture.
Medical subject headings
- Kidney Calculi
- Nephrostomy, Percutaneous
- Punctures