Desiderata or dogma: what the evidence reveals about physician attire.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18286342.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s11606-008-0546-8 and PMC identifier 2324152.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Physician-patient interactions are complex and depend on multiple factors including common cultural definitions and evolving social norms. The once purely philosophical debate over what constitutes appropriate physician attire can benefit from a growing evidence base in the literature. DISCUSSION: Although this literature is commonly regarded as supporting traditional attire, the data actually represent a more balanced distribution of opinions held by patients and by physicians. Perhaps interpretations favoring a conservative approach are expected given the history and tradition of the physician-patient relationship. CONCLUSION: Nevertheless, in the age of evidence-based medicine, it is difficult to argue against scrutiny of the available literature. Evidence that challenges the importance of traditional physician attire is reviewed.
Medical subject headings
- Clothing
- Physician-Patient Relations
- Public Opinion