Measuring fatigue in persons with spinal cord injury.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18295634.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.009 and PMC identifier 3595300.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). A 2-week methodologic study was conducted to assess the internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity of the FSS. A tertiary spinal cord rehabilitation facility. Forty-eight community-living subjects at least 1 year post-SCI with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade A or B SCI and no medical conditions causing fatigue. The sample was predominantly male (n=31 [65%]) with tetraplegia (n=26 [54%]) and ASIA grade A injuries (n=30 [63%]). The average duration since injury was 14.9 years. Not applicable. The ASIA Impairment Scale, the FSS, a visual analog scale for fatigue (VAS-F), the vitality scale of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Mean FSS score +/- standard deviation at baseline was 4.4+/-1.4, with 54% (n=26) scoring greater than 4. The internal consistency of the FSS was excellent (Cronbach alpha=.89). Two-week test-retest reliability was adequate (intraclass correlation coefficient, .84; 95% confidence interval, .74-.90). The magnitude of the relationship was as hypothesized for the VAS-F (r=.67) and CES-D (r=.58) and lower than hypothesized for the vitality subscore (r=-.48) of the SF-36. The FSS has acceptable reliability with regard to internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity in persons with motor complete SCI.
Medical subject headings
- Fatigue
- Spinal Cord Injuries