Evaluation of wound closure using different incision techniques with 23-gauge and 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy systems.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18301029.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318156dea3.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To describe the anatomic and histopathologic outcomes using different incision techniques with transconjunctival 23-G and 25-G vitrectomy systems. New Zealand rabbits were randomized to either 23-G or 25-G vitrectomy surgeries using angled incisions and straight incisions. After pars plana vitrectomy, the cannulas were removed and 0.1% trypan blue was injected to evaluate for leakage. The animals were killed on day 7 and the eyes enucleated for gross analysis and histopathologic analysis by frozen section. Leakage of trypan blue was noted from 10.8% and 5.7% of straight and angled incisions, respectively. There was no difference between 23-G and 25-G incisions (8.3%). On gross examination, the 25-G system resulted in 58% and 24% open external wounds for straight and angled incisions, respectively (P = 0.04). The 23-G system resulted in 83% and 39% open external wounds with straight and angled incisions, respectively (P = 0.017). The average wound area after the 23-G surgery was 223.1 microm(2) and 115.7 microm(2) for straight versus angled incisions, respectively (P = 0.02). The average wound area formed after the 25-G surgery was 160.3 microm(2) and 85.2 microm(2) for straight versus angled incisions, respectively (P = 0.001). Outcomes were similar for 23-G angled incisions, 25-G straight incisions, and 25-G angled incisions.
Medical subject headings
- Microsurgery
- Sclera
- Vitrectomy
- Wound Healing