Current issues with emergency cardiac ultrasound probe and image conventions.
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18304059.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00052.x.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
As emergency physicians (EPs) and other noncardiologists incorporate bedside ultrasound (US) and bedside echocardiography (echo) into their practice, confusion has resulted from the differing imaging conventions used by cardiac and general imaging. The author discusses the origin of these differences, current cardiac imaging conventions, and controversies in emergency medicine (EM) regarding adoption of imaging conventions. Also discussed in detail are specific echo windows and experience with different approaches. While there is no perfect solution to merging the differing conventions, it is important that those performing and teaching bedside US and echo have a thorough understanding of the issues involved, and adopt a consistent approach.
Medical subject headings
- Emergency Medicine
- Point-of-Care Systems
- Ultrasonography