Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18308689.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn045.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study was performed to evaluate the functional outcomes of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided jailed side-branch (SB) intervention strategy. One hundred and ten patients treated by provisional strategy were consecutively enrolled and SB FFR was measured in 91 patients. SB intervention was allowed when FFR was <0.75. FFR measurement was repeated after SB intervention and at 6-month follow-up angiography. In 26 of 28 SB lesions with FFR <0.75, balloon angioplasty (SB balloon/artery ratio = 0.84 +/- 0.14) was performed and FFR >or=0.75 was achieved in 92% of the lesions although the mean residual stenosis was 69 +/- 10%. During follow-up, there were no changes in SB FFR in lesions with (0.86 +/- 0.05 to 0.84 +/- 0.01, P = 0.4) and without SB angioplasty (0.87 +/- 0.06 to 0.89 +/- 0.07, P = 0.1). Functional restenosis (FFR <0.75) rate was only 8% (5/65). When clinical outcomes of these patients were compared with 110 patients with similar bifurcation lesions treated without FFR-guidance, there was no difference in 9-month cardiac event rates (4.6 vs. 3.7%, P = 0.7) between the two groups. In conclusion, FFR-guided SB intervention strategy resulted in good functional outcomes.
Medical subject headings
- Coronary Stenosis
- Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial