Comparative study of four radiofrequency generators for the treatment of snoring.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18312874.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.11.008.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare the efficacy and safety of four radiofrequency generators (Ellman, Select Sutter, Coblator, Somnus) for the treatment of simple snoring. Multicenter, randomized, prospective single-blind study on 120 selected patients with simple snoring (apnea/hypopnea index <10/h of sleep). Snoring sound intensity was measured on a visual analog scale and the partner's short-term satisfaction rate was evaluated after two treatment sessions maximum. Discomfort, pain, and medication intake were compared. Radiofrequency decreased the snoring sound intensity from 7.9 +/- 1.7 to 4.4 +/- 2.7 (P < 0.0001). The four radiofrequency generators had a statistically comparable efficacy. The Ellman generator caused less discomfort and required less anti-inflammatory drugs. Despite different technical characteristics, the four generators had a comparable efficacy with good safety. The Ellman generator induced the least discomfort.
Medical subject headings
- Catheter Ablation
- Palate
- Snoring