Serial measurements of cystatin C are more accurate than creatinine-based methods in detecting declining renal function in type 1 diabetes.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18319326.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2337/dc07-1588.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Cystatin C-and creatinine-based methods were compared with (99m)-technetium-diethylene-triamine-penta-acetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) plasma clearance (isotopic glomerular filtration rate [iGFR]) for detecting declining renal function. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was monitored over a mean of 10.1 years in 85 subjects with type 1 diabetes (with an average of 5.6 measurements per individual). Baseline mean +/- SD iGFR of the cohort was 106.1 +/- 2.6 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). The rates of decline in GFR (DeltaGFR) were derived using linear regression. In 19 of 85 subjects with declining renal function (i.e., DeltaiGFR >3.3 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year), DeltaGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year) was 6.5 by iGFR, 4.2 by 10(4)/creatinine, 3.6 by Cockcroft-Gault formula, 3.4 by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)-6 equation, and 3.5 by the MDRD-4 variable equation (P < 0.01 vs. iGFR). In comparison, DeltaGFR was 6.1 using the formula Cys-GFR = (86.7/cystatin C concentration) - 4.2 (not significant). Cystatin C was more accurate in detecting decline in renal function than creatinine-based methods in this population of subjects with type 1 diabetes and a normal mean baseline GFR.
Medical subject headings
- Cystatins
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
- Diabetic Nephropathies
- Kidney Function Tests