Contemporary surgical or percutaneous management of severe aortic stenosis in the elderly.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18326007.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn081.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To assess patient characteristics, therapeutic options, and their results in patients referred to a tertiary centre with on-site capabilities for surgical and percutaneous valvular interventions for the management of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). Sixty-six consecutive patients >70 years (83 +/- 6 years) were referred for severe AS. Their mortality risk predicted by the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons-Predicted Risk of Mortality scores were on average 20 +/- 14% and 17 +/- 7%, respectively. Thirty-nine patients (59%) were considered at high-risk for surgery or inoperable after multidisciplinary evaluation: 12 (31%) underwent a transfemoral aortic valve implantation and 27 were considered unsuitable and treated medically (n = 16) or with valvuloplasty (n = 7), or were re-directed towards surgery (n = 4). The 27 other patients underwent valve replacement. In-hospital mortality was 9% (6 of 66). There were three hospital deaths in patients treated percutaneously, two in those treated medically, and one after surgery. At 6 months, 10% (6 of 60) of the survivors died: two after valvuloplasty and four after medical treatment. A large proportion of elderly patients referred for management of severe AS have a high-risk profile. The availability of percutaneous valvular interventions increases the number of those who are offered interventions.
Medical subject headings
- Aortic Valve Stenosis
- Bioprosthesis
- Heart Valve Prosthesis
- Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation