Newborn weight charts underestimate the incidence of low birthweight in preterm infants.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18395687.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.011.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The objective of the study was to compare sonographic fetal weight estimates with newborn weight charts and analyze the predictive accuracy of the ponderal index (PI) in preterm infants. We generated sonographic reference curves for fetal weight and PI estimates from a database of fetal biometric records from 12,589 term deliveries. We then plotted sonographic and newborn weight and PI of 2406 preterm newborns on these curves and compared them with published newborn weight charts. The third centiles of sonographic and newborn weights diverged markedly between 25 and 36 weeks of gestation and by more than 400 g at 32-33 weeks. In contrast, sonographic and newborn PI values were similar despite uncertainties as to fetal length. We suggest using sonographic reference fetal weights to screen preterm newborns for low birthweight. Uncertainties in fetal length threaten the reliability of the PI.
Medical subject headings
- Fetal Weight
- Infant, Low Birth Weight
- Infant, Premature
- Neonatal Screening
- Ultrasonography, Prenatal