Laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty: results and outcome.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18420339.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.102.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Routine use of laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty has not yet been established. To assess the outcome of laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty. Twenty-three patients underwent laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty for hypocompliant bladder. Bladder dissection and reconstruction of the ileovesical anastomosis were performed laparoscopically, whereas the ileal pouch was prepared extracorporeally through a small 3- to 4-cm muscle-splitting incision. Patient data, operative details, and follow-up were recorded. Urodynamic evaluation was performed preoperatively and after 12 mo, taking the bladder capacity and the maximum detrusor pressure as a measure for the outcome of the procedure. All cases were completed laparoscopically, with a mean operative time 202 min; mean hospital stay 5 d, and mean urethral catheter duration 11 d. After 12 mo, the estimated bladder volume increased from a mean 111 ml to 788 ml (p<0.01), whereas the maximum detrusor pressure dropped from a mean 92 cm H(2)O to 15 cm H(2)O (p<0.01). During a mean follow-up of 39 mo, two long-term complications have been reported: bladder stone and spontaneous rupture of the augmented bladder due to neglected clean intermittent self-catheterization. Laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty is a safe procedure, technically feasible and with favourable urodynamic outcome.
Medical subject headings
- Ileum
- Laparoscopy
- Urinary Bladder
- Urinary Bladder Diseases