The relative value of operon predictions.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18420711.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/bib/bbn019.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
For most organisms, computational operon predictions are the only source of genome-wide operon information. Operon prediction methods described in literature are based on (a combination of) the following five criteria: (i) intergenic distance, (ii) conserved gene clusters, (iii) functional relation, (iv) sequence elements and (v) experimental evidence. The performance estimates of operon predictions reported in literature cannot directly be compared due to differences in methods and data used in these studies. Here, we survey the current status of operon prediction methods. Based on a comparison of the performance of operon predictions on Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis we conclude that there is still room for improvement. We expect that existing and newly generated genomics and transcriptomics data will further improve accuracy of operon prediction methods.
Medical subject headings
- Algorithms
- Chromosome Mapping
- Models, Genetic
- Operon
- Sequence Alignment
- Sequence Analysis, DNA
- Software