Rate constants rather than biochemical mechanism determine behaviour of genetic clocks.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18426770.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1098/rsif.2008.0046.focus and PMC identifier 2706451.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Many biological systems contain both positive and negative feedbacks. These are often classified as resonators or integrators. Resonators respond preferentially to oscillating signals of a particular frequency. Integrators, on the other hand, accumulate a response to signals. Computational neuroscientists often refer to neurons showing integrator properties as type I neurons and those showing resonator properties as type II neurons. Guantes & Poyatos have shown that type I or type II behaviour can be seen in genetic clocks. They argue that when negative feedback occurs through transcription regulation and post-translationally, genetic clocks act as integrators and resonators, respectively. Here we show that either behaviour can be seen with either design and in a wide range of genetic clocks. This highlights the importance of parameters rather than biochemical mechanism in determining the system behaviour.
Medical subject headings
- Biological Clocks
- Models, Genetic