Effects of the incontinence dish pessary on urethral support and urodynamic parameters.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18455542.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.02.004.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the effects of the incontinence dish pessary (IDP) on urethral mobility and urodynamics. Prospective study of women with symptoms of stress incontinence. Q-tip test was performed recording the resting and straining angles with and without an IDP. Changes in resting and straining angles were calculated. Those with evidence of urodynamic stress incontinence had urodynamics with the IDP. Paired t-test was used to compare the difference in Q-tip angles with and without the pessary. Mean Q-tip straining angle without and with the pessary, respectively, was 57.8 (+19.5) and 34.4 (+29.7). Mean change was 23.5 (+18.5) P < .00001. Maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) was significantly increased by 19.7 cm H(2)0 P < .001. Overall, 60% of the subjects did not leak with the IDP. The IDP eliminates >60% of USI. The mechanism of action may be a combination of improved UVJ support and increased MUCP.
Medical subject headings
- Pessaries
- Urethra
- Urinary Incontinence
- Uterine Prolapse