Five-year comparative study of highly cross-linked (crossfire) and traditional polyethylene.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18534491.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2007.09.015.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the linear penetration rates of a highly cross-linked ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene to traditional polyethylene. Twenty-seven highly cross-linked components were matched to 27 traditional polyethylene components with respect to age, sex, body mass index, and activity level. Each group was followed up for a mean of approximately 6 years. Linear penetration was measured using Martell's computerized technique (J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1635). The mean total penetration was 0.283 mm (SD, 0.253) for the highly cross-linked group. The mean total penetration for the traditional polyethylene was 0.696 mm (SD, 0.402). This difference was highly significant (P < or = .001). Our experience demonstrates a 59% reduction in total penetration of highly cross-linked polyethylene when compared with traditional polyethylene at a minimum of 5 years.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Materials Testing
- Polyethylene
Anatomy
- hip