A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18555653.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.012.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We classified 182 consecutive patients (195 hips) treated by primary cementless minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (MIS-THA) into 2 groups via the surgical approaches: direct anterior approach (DAA, 99 hips) and a mini-posterior approach (MPA, 96 hips). Ninety-nine percent of the cups in the DAA group and 91% in the MPA group had been implanted within the safe zone (P = .008). Patients in the DAA group could get single-leg stance of more than 5 seconds by 16.6 days (P = .0004), had positive Tredelenburg's sign by 29%, got 50-m walking time of 52.3 seconds (P = .017), and showed improvement in the use of assistive walking aids (P = .031) at 3 weeks postoperatively. The results of this study suggest more rapid recovery for hip function and gait ability after MIS-THA via a DAA when compared to an MPA.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Hip Joint
- Joint Diseases
Anatomy
- hip