External fixator pin insertion techniques: biomechanical analysis and clinical relevance.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 1861045.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A series of identically matched pairs of fresh-frozen canine femora (approximating human radii in size and dimension) were used to mechanically compare pull-out strength between 4 mm predrilled, self-tapping, half-pins and 4 mm self-drilling, self-tapping half-pins with drill bit-like cutting flutes. A second biomechanical and videotape analysis was done comparing the differences of pin insertion by power versus hand drilling. Results indicated a mean 22% reduction in bone purchase of self-drilling, self-tapping pins compared with that of predrilled pins and a marked increase in depth of insertion required of the self-drilling pins for comparable pin purchase (10 mm). It was also observed that a visible "wobble factor" exists, which tends to weaken the pin-bone interface when hand drilling is performed.
Medical subject headings
- External Fixators
- Fracture Fixation
Anatomy
- femur