The impact of consumer-directed health plans and patient socioeconomic status on physician recommendations for colorectal cancer screening.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18629590.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s11606-008-0714-x and PMC identifier 2533392.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Consumer-directed health plans are increasingly common, yet little is known about their impact on physician decision-making and preventive service use. OBJECTIVE: To determine how patients' deductible levels and socioeconomic status may affect primary care physicians' recommendations for colorectal cancer screening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Screening recommendations were elicited using hypothetical vignettes from a national sample of 1,500 primary care physicians. Physicians were randomized to one of four vignettes describing a patient with either low or high socioeconomic status (SES) and either low- or high-deductible plan. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine how recommendations varied as a function of SES and deductible. OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of recommendation for home fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and inappropriate screening, defined as no screening or office-based fecal occult blood testing. RESULTS: A total of 528 (49%) eligible physicians responded. Overall, 7.2% of physicians recommended inappropriate screening; 3.2% of patients with high SES in low-deductible plans received inappropriate screening recommendations and 11.4% of patients with low SES in high-deductible plans for an adjusted odds ratio of 0.22 (0.05-0.89). The odds of a colonoscopy recommendation were over ten times higher (AOR 11.46, 5.26-24.94) for patients with high SES in low-deductible plans compared to patients with low SES in high-deductible plans. Funds in medical savings accounts eliminated differences in inappropriate screening recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Patient SES and deductible-level affect physician recommendations for preventive care. Coverage of preventive services and funds in medical savings accounts may help to mitigate the impact of high-deductibles and SES on inappropriate recommendations.
Medical subject headings
- Aged
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Colorectal Neoplasms/economics
- Community Participation
- Community Participation/methods
- Community Participation/trends
- Female
- Health Plan Implementation
- Health Plan Implementation/economics
- Health Plan Implementation/methods
- Health Plan Implementation/trends
- Health Planning Guidelines
- Humans
- Insurance, Health
- Insurance, Health/economics
- Insurance, Health/trends
- Male
- Mass Screening
- Mass Screening/economics
- Mass Screening/methods
- Mass Screening/trends
- Middle Aged
- Patient Participation
- Patient Participation/economics
- Patient Participation/trends
- Pilot Projects
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends
- Social Class