Detection of inner tube defects in co-axial circle and Bain breathing systems: a comparison of occlusion and Pethick tests.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18647290.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05568.x.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The performance of the occlusion and Pethick tests in detecting faulty inner tubes in co-axial circle and Bain systems was compared. Twelve co-axial circle and 12 Bain anaesthetic breathing systems were tested using the occlusion and the Pethick tests. For each system, three tubes were intact, and the remaining nine had a defect deliberately created in the inner tube (three proximal, three middle and three distal). The investigators were blinded to which of the tubes were defective, and to each other's results. The results showed 100% specificity for both tests. The sensitivity of the occlusion test for detecting faulty breathing systems was found to be good (98%). Our results suggest that the occlusion test should be performed in preference to the Pethick test when testing co-axial circle and Bain systems.
Medical subject headings
- Anesthesia, Closed-Circuit
- Materials Testing