Implantation of Kelman-style, open-loop anterior chamber lenses during keratoplasty for aphakic and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. A comparison with iris-sutured posterior chamber lenses.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 1866140.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The clinical and specular microscopic results of 40 cases (39 patients) of penetrating keratoplasty during which a Kelman-style anterior chamber intraocular lens was implanted were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-one pseudophakic eyes received an intraocular lens exchange and nine aphakic eyes received a secondary intraocular lens. Postoperative follow-up averaged 24.5 months (range, 3 to 51 months). At 1, 2, and 3 years after keratoplasty, 39.3%, 63.2%, and 63.6% of eyes, respectively, had visual acuities of 20/40 or better. Ninety-five percent of the grafts remained clear. Causes of poor postoperative visual acuity included cystoid macular edema (32.5%), new glaucoma (22.5%), and age-related macular degeneration (10.0%). Other causes were endothelial rejection leading to graft failure, corneal ulceration, and retinal detachment. Corneal endothelial cell loss by specular microscopy was 11.5% at 1 years, 21.3% at 2 years, and 25.0% at 3 years. These results were compared with cell loss associated with iris-sutured posterior chamber lenses in penetrating keratoplasty. Visual outcomes and complication rates were similar between these two methods; however, the endothelial attrition at 1 and 2 years for the sutured posterior chamber lens was greater than that of the Kelman anterior chamber lens.
Medical subject headings
- Anterior Chamber
- Aphakia
- Corneal Diseases
- Iris
- Keratoplasty, Penetrating
- Lenses, Intraocular