Ultrasound- or nerve stimulation-guided wrist blocks for carpal tunnel release: a randomized prospective comparative study.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18675750.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.rapm.2008.01.004.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We hypothesized that ultrasound-guided wrist blocks may be faster to perform, and may increase success rate, compared with nerve stimulation-guided wrist blocks. Sixty patients undergoing ambulatory endoscopic carpal tunnel release were randomly allocated to receive median and ulnar nerve blocks using either sensory-motor nerve stimulation (n = 30) or ultrasound guidance (n = 30). Four mL of mepivacaine 1.5% was injected around each nerve. Performance time and onset time of complete sensory block were assessed. Median time to perform both median (ultrasound, 55 [48-60] vs. nerve stimulation, 100 [65-150] seconds, P = .002) and ulnar (ultrasound, 57 [50-70] vs. nerve stimulation, 80 [60-105] seconds, P = .02) nerve blocks were significantly shorter in the ultrasound group. Onset time of complete sensory block in the median (ultrasound, 370 [278-459] vs. nerve stimulation, 254 [230-300] seconds, P = .02) and ulnar (ultrasound, 367 [296-420] vs. nerve stimulation, 241 [210-300] seconds, P = .01) nerve areas were shorter in the nerve stimulation group. The success rate was 93% in both groups. This randomized prospective study demonstrates that ultrasound-guided wrist nerve blocks are as efficient as those performed with nerve stimulation.
Medical subject headings
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- Median Nerve
- Nerve Block
- Ulnar Nerve
- Wrist