A primer on selected aspects of evidence-based practice to questions of treatment. Part 2: interpreting results, application to clinical practice, and self-evaluation.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18678961.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2519/jospt.2008.2725.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The process of evidence-based practice (EBP) guides clinicians in the integration of individual clinical expertise, patient values and expectations, and the best available evidence. Becoming proficient with this process takes time and consistent practice, but should ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes. The EBP process entails 5 steps: (1) formulating an appropriate question, (2) performing an efficient literature search, (3) critically appraising the best available evidence, (4) applying the best evidence to clinical practice, and (5) assessing outcomes of care. This second commentary in a 2-part series will review principles relating to steps 3 through 5 of this 5-step model. The purpose of this commentary is to provide a perspective to assist clinicians in interpreting results, applying the evidence to patient care, and evaluating proficiency with EBP skills in studies of interventions for orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.
Medical subject headings
- Clinical Competence
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care