Zone 2 flexor tendon repair in young children: a comparative study of four-strand versus two-strand repair.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18687828.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/1753193408090761.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study compares the active ranges of finger motion and rupture rates of two-strand and four-strand repairs in zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations in young children. A total of 29 patients (under the age of 4 years) with 32 flexor tendon lacerations in zone 2 were evaluated. The injured tendons were randomly repaired with either two-strand or four-strand modified Strickland techniques. At a mean follow-up period of 11 months, the mean total active motion of interphalangeal joints was 156 degrees in the two-strand and 158 degrees in the four-strand group. According to the Strickland original method, this means an average of 89% (range 57-100%) of normal function in the two-strand and 90% (range 60-100%) in the four-strand group. There were no ruptures of the four-strand repairs, but one two-strand repair failed within 3 weeks of the repair. Statistically, we were not able to show any significant difference in the active ranges of finger motion achieved with two-strand and four-strand repairs.
Medical subject headings
- Finger Injuries
- Suture Techniques
- Tendon Injuries