Identifying the causes of stillbirth: a comparison of four classification systems.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18771999.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.098.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To identify the classification protocol for stillbirth that minimizes the rate of unexplained causes. All stillbirths at > 22 weeks from 1995-2007 underwent a workup inclusive of fetal ultrasonography, amniocentesis for karyotype and cultures, placental histology, fetal autopsy, skin biopsy, total body X-ray, maternal testing for thrombophilias, TORCH, Parvovirus spp, thyroid function, indirect Coombs, Kleiheuer-Betke test, and genital cultures. To such a cohort, we applied the 4 most commonly used classification protocols. The stillbirth rate during the study period was 0.4% (154/37,958). The RoDeCo classification provided the lowest rate of unexplained stillbirth (14.3%) compared with Wigglesworth (47.4%), de Galan-Roosen (18.2%), and Tulip (16.2%) classifications. Mean gestational age at stillbirth in unexplained vs explained stillbirth was similar in the 4 protocols. Adoption of a consistent and appropriate workup protocol can reduce the rate of unexplained stillbirth to 14%.
Medical subject headings
- Cause of Death
- Stillbirth