Measuring tools for functional outcomes in total knee arthroplasty.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18780136.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s11999-008-0468-0 and PMC identifier 2565042.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty has come under increasing scrutiny attributable to the fact that it is a high-volume, high-cost medical intervention in an era of increasingly scarce medical resources. Health-related quality-of-life outcomes have been developed such that healthcare providers might determine how good an intervention is and whether it is cost-effective. Total knee arthroplasty has been subjected to disease-specific, patient-specific, global health, functional capacity, and cost-to-utility outcome measures. Patient satisfaction is high (90%) after total knee arthroplasty and 93% of patients would have this operative procedure again. Large improvements in preoperative to postoperative WOMAC scores occurred (over 39 of 100 points in 82% of patients). Cost-to-quality outcomes demonstrated total knee arthroplasties are extremely cost-effective. This analysis documents total knee arthroplasty is a highly efficacious procedure that competes favorably with all medical and surgical interventions.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care
- Patient Satisfaction
- Quality of Life
- Range of Motion, Articular
- Walking
Anatomy
- knee