Concordance between common dry eye diagnostic tests.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18782801.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bjo.2007.131722 and PMC identifier 4211111.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Large variations in results of diagnostic tests for mild to moderate dry eye are widely recognised. The purpose of this study was to assess if there was concordance between common dry eye diagnostic tests. A total of 91 subjects were recruited to the study. The tear film and ocular surface were evaluated using the phenol red thread test (PRT), tear film break-up time (TBUT), biomicroscopic examination and impression cytological assessment of conjunctival goblet cells. Dry eye symptoms were assessed using McMonnies' dry eye questionnaire (MQ) and statistical correlations between all tests were assessed. This study cohort did not include severe aqueous deficient dry eye patients as determined by the PRT. A statistically significant difference was noted between PRT results and all other tests (p<or=0.001). Only Meibomian gland pathology, MQ, reduced goblet cell density and TBUT (<or=7 s) demonstrated correlation determined by McNemar's test. A correlation was found only between tests assessing lipid/mucous deficiency (Meibomian gland evaluation, goblet cell density, TBUT and MQ).
Medical subject headings
- Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- Tears