Using a return-on-investment estimation model to evaluate outcomes from an obesity management worksite health promotion program.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18784545.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318184a489.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Certain modifiable risk factors lead to higher health care costs and reduced worker productivity. A predictive return-on-investment (ROI) model was applied to an obesity management intervention to demonstrate the use of econometric modeling in establishing financial justification for worksite health promotion. Self-reported risk factors (n = 890) were analyzed using chi2 and t test methods. Changes in risk factors, demographics, and financial measures comprised the model inputs that determined medical and productivity savings. Over 1 year, 7 of 10 health risks decreased. Of total projected savings ($311,755), 59% were attributed to reduced health care expenditures ($184,582) and 41% resulted from productivity improvements ($127,173), a $1.17 to $1.00 ROI. Using an ROI model to project program savings is a practical way to provide financial justification for investment in worksite health promotion when risk reduction data are available.
Medical subject headings
- Health Promotion
- Models, Economic
- Obesity
- Occupational Health
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care
- Workplace