Prospective, randomized comparison of cobalt-chrome and titanium trilock femoral stems.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18835692.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.035.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this article was to demonstrate the efficacy of a cementless, flat, tapered wedge femoral stem and compare cobalt-chrome and titanium femoral stems with this design. Three hundred ninety femoral stems observed for a mean of 4.7 years (2.0-8.9 years) were prospectively evaluated with clinical and radiographic follow-up. Hips were stratified by Dorr classification, bone stock (femoral index), size of implant used, and material of femoral implant. Survivorship of the femoral stem at 8.9 years was 99.8% with no significant difference between cohorts. Thigh pain (4.9%) was more common with cobalt-chrome femoral stems (6.5%) than titanium femoral stems (3.1%). The flat, tapered wedge femoral stem design provides excellent femoral reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty. On the basis of this study, we use titanium femoral stems.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Chromium Alloys
- Femur
- Hip Prosthesis
- Titanium
Anatomy
- femur
- hip