Reconstructive pelvic surgery and plastic surgery: safety and efficacy of combined surgery.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18845294.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.053.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to address the safety of combining aesthetic and pelvic floor reconstructive procedures. Fifty-four subjects were included in a case-control study; 18 patients undergoing combined pelvic and plastic reconstructive surgery, age and procedure matched to 18 pelvic surgery and 18 plastic surgery only controls. Chi-square, t test, and Kruskal-Wallis analysis were used to compare the estimated blood loss (EBL), body mass index (BMI), hospital days, operative times, and complications between the groups. No differences were seen with regards to age, BMI, or EBL. There was, however, a significant increase in minor complications and hospital stay after combined procedures relative to the pelvic surgery control group but not the aesthetic control group. Operative times were only greater during combined procedures relative to isolated pelvic floor procedures. Combining pelvic and aesthetic procedures may increase complications, operative times, and length of hospital stay when compared to pelvic reconstructive surgery alone.
Medical subject headings
- Plastic Surgery Procedures
- Suburethral Slings
- Surgery, Plastic
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress
- Uterine Prolapse