Haemostatic effects of adrenaline-lidocaine subcutaneous infiltration at donor sites.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 18950945.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2008.06.019.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study sought methods in burn surgery to reduce postoperative pain and blood loss at donor sites. A prospective, randomised, controlled, blinded trial included 56 people undergoing burn surgery, divided into two groups. Both groups received subcutaneous infiltration at donor sites, with either 1:500,000 adrenaline solution containing added lidocaine or with 0.45% normal saline (controls). Outcome measurements included amount of intraoperative bleeding, need for electrocautery, days the hydrocolloid dressing remained on donor sites, percentage of re-epithelialised skin at donor sites 1 week after surgery and viability of skin grafts. Results indicated that subcutaneous adrenaline-lidocaine infiltration at donor sites reduced intraoperative bleeding, decreased postoperative pain, shortened the duration of surgery and general anaesthesia and accelerated re-epithelialisation at the donor site. The overall graft take in both groups was similar.
Medical subject headings
- Blood Loss, Surgical
- Burns
- Epinephrine
- Hemostasis, Surgical
- Lidocaine
- Vasoconstrictor Agents