Selection of workers' compensation treatment guidelines: California experience.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19001954.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181841fb4.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Workers' compensation systems increasingly use mandatory treatment guidelines to guide clinicians and for utilization management. This article describes the steps for selecting such guidelines. On the basis of experience with the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles project to help California select guidelines, we identified the necessary choices and processes for guideline selection and evaluation. Major steps in guideline selection include: 1) define purpose; 2) assign decision-making authority; 3) decide whether to use existing guidelines or develop new ones; 4) choose whether to use one or multiple existing guidelines; 5) specify clinical topics that guidelines should address; 6) identify and screen guidelines; 7) evaluate guidelines; 8) consider implications of results; 9) select guideline(s); 10) disseminate selection; and 11) assess long-term effectiveness. Given the many choices required, selecting mandatory workers' compensation guidelines should involve careful planning and a transparent, well-defined process.
Medical subject headings
- Guidelines as Topic
- Health Care Reform
- Occupational Medicine
- Workers' Compensation