Latex-free gloves: safer for whom?
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19056214.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.014.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Increasing latex hypersensitivity among patients and health care workers has prompted the development of latex-free surgical gloves. Latex-free gloves must perform equally as the existing latex standard. We analyzed perforation rates in a clinical trial comparing latex and a latex-free alternative during primary hip and knee arthroplasty. The overall latex glove perforation rate was 8.4% compared with 21.6% for the latex-free alternative (chi(2) P < .001). The operation perforation rate for latex gloves was 34.4% compared with 80% for latex-free gloves (chi(2) P < .001). We suggest that the latex-free glove tested cannot provide a reliable barrier between the surgeon and the patient. As such, we question the safety of these gloves and the standards sets by the regulators.
Medical subject headings
- Equipment Failure
- Gloves, Surgical
- Latex
Anatomy
- hip
- knee