Comparison of bone removed during total hip arthroplasty with a resurfacing or conventional femoral component: a cadaveric study.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19056234.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.004.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We sought to examine the amount of bone removed during total hip arthroplasty with a resurfacing femoral component, compared to with a conventional, stemmed femoral component, by using 6 male and 4 female cadaveric pelves with attached bilateral proximal femora. Using randomized assignment and order, a total hip arthroplasty with a resurfacing femoral implant was performed on one side, and total hip arthroplasty with a cementless, stemmed femoral implant was performed on the contralateral side. The relationship between native femoral head diameter and the implanted acetabular socket was on average within 2 mm for both procedures. No significant difference was observed in the amount of acetabular bone removed (9.8 g for hip resurfacing vs 8.8 g). However, a resurfacing component resulted in approximated 3 x less bone removal from the femur (25.8 g vs 75.1 g). This study shows that the preservation of femoral bone with a resurfacing femoral component does not result in an increased removal of acetabular bone when compared to the use of a conventional, stemmed femoral component.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Femur Head
- Hip Prosthesis
- Osteotomy
Anatomy
- femur
- hip
- pelvis