Outcomes of hysterectomies performed by supervised residents vs those performed by attendings alone.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19084099.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.052.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The objective of the study was to compare the outcomes of hysterectomies performed by residents under supervision of a teaching physician with those performed by attendings alone. This was a retrospective cohort analysis of hysterectomies performed at the Greater Baltimore Medical Center from 2004 to 2006. Of 159 nonteaching and 265 teaching cases, there was no significant difference in any of the surgical outcomes, except mean operating room time in minutes (94.8 [+/- 47.0] vs 107.4 [+/- 42.4]; P = .005), seromas (2.5% vs 0%; P = .02), and others (5% vs 0.8%; P = .007) in nonteaching vs teaching cases, respectively. The demographics and comorbidities were similar. The mean operating room time difference of 13 minutes was not clinically significant. Although teaching hysterectomies take a bit longer to perform, there were no greater adverse outcomes.
Medical subject headings
- Clinical Competence
- Hysterectomy
- Internship and Residency
- Medical Staff, Hospital