A randomized comparative study of the prophylactic use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus netilmycin-metronidazole in transrectal prostatic biopsy.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 1908529.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
An open randomized study was done to compare the prophylactic value of single doses of netilmycin-metronidazole versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the prevention of postoperative infections associated with transrectal prostatic biopsy. Of 117 patients enrolled in the study 101 were evaluated and of these patients 47 received netilmycin-metronidazole and 54 received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The bacteremia rate in the netilmycin-metronidazole group was 28% (13 of 47 patients) with a 95% confidence interval of 18 to 42% and in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group it was 37% (20 of 54) with a confidence interval of 26 to 50% (p = 0.43). None of the patients with bacteremia was symptomatic. Urinary tract infection rates were greater in the netilmycin-metronidazole group: 17% (8 of 47 patients) versus 2% (1 of 54) in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group, p = 0.01. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (cotrimoxazole) is a better choice as an antimicrobial prophylaxis for patients undergoing transrectal prostatic biopsy.
Medical subject headings
- Biopsy
- Infection Control
- Metronidazole
- Netilmicin
- Premedication
- Prostate
- Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination