Failure of augmentation of labor epidural analgesia for intrapartum cesarean delivery: a retrospective review.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19095859.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181900260.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to identify the incidence and predictive factors associated with failed labor epidural augmentation for cesarean delivery. Data of parturients, who had received neuraxial labor analgesia and who subsequently required intrapartum cesarean delivery during an 18-mo period, were retrospectively studied. Predictors associated with failure of extension of epidural analgesia in the presence of adequate time for onset of epidural anesthesia were identified by univariate logistic regression. Of the 1025 parturients, 1.7% had failed epidural extension. Predictors of failed epidural anesthesia included initiation of labor analgesia with plain epidural technique (compared to combined spinal-epidural) (P = 0.001), >or=2 episodes of breakthrough pain during labor (P < 0.001) and prolonged duration of neuraxial labor analgesia (P = 0.02).
Medical subject headings
- Analgesia, Epidural
- Analgesia, Obstetrical
- Anesthesia, Epidural
- Anesthesia, Obstetrical
- Anesthesia, Spinal
- Anesthetics, Local
- Cesarean Section
- Labor Pain