Outcome of a second two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic knee infection.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19224302.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s11999-009-0739-4 and PMC identifier 2690747.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Recurrent or persistent infection after two-stage exchange arthroplasty for previously infected total knee replacement is a challenging clinical situation. We asked whether a second two-stage procedure could eradicate the infection and preserve knee function. We evaluated 18 selected patients with failed two-stage total knee arthroplasty implantation treated with a second two-stage reimplantation between 1999 and 2005. Failure of treatment was defined as recurrence or persistence of infection. The minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 40 months; range, 24-83 months). Recurrent or persistent infection was diagnosed in four of 18 patients, two of whom were successfully treated with a third two-stage exchange arthroplasty. Knee Society score questionnaires administered at the last followup showed an average Knee Society knee score of 73 points (range, 24-100 points) and an average functional score of 49 points (range, 20-90 points). The data suggest repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a reasonable option for eradicating periprosthetic infection, relieving pain, and achieving a satisfactory level of function for some patients. Level IV, therapeutic study.
Medical subject headings
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Prosthesis-Related Infections
- Reoperation
Anatomy
- knee