Potential bias in GO::TermFinder.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19279157.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/bib/bbn054.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The increased need for multiple statistical comparisons under conditions of non-independence in bioinformatics applications, such as DNA microarray data analysis, has led to the development of alternatives to the conventional Bonferroni correction for adjusting P-values. The use of the false discovery rate (FDR), in particular, has grown considerably. However, the calculation of the FDR frequently depends on drawing random samples from a population, and inappropriate sampling will result in a bias in the calculated FDR. In this work, we demonstrate a bias due to incorrect random sampling in the widely used GO::TermFinder package. Both T(2) and permutation tests are used to confirm the bias for a test set of data, which leads to an overestimation of the FDR of about 10%. A simple fix to the random sampling method is proposed to remove the bias.
Medical subject headings
- Algorithms
- Computational Biology
- Information Storage and Retrieval
- Software