Comparison of distraction osteogenesis for congenital and acquired limb-length discrepancy in children.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19292213.
- Also identified by DOI 10.3928/01477447-20080201-04.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study evaluated 116 lower limb lengthenings in 88 consecutive patients (mean age, 13.5 years) treated for congenital (31 patients [46 lengthened segments]) and acquired (57 patients [70 lengthened segments]) limb-length discrepancy. Mean follow-up was 3.8 years. Mean lengthening index was 34+/-16 days/cm in the congenital group and 32+/-9 days/cm in the acquired group; this difference was not statistically significant (P> .05). Mean length of distraction regenerate was 6.4+/-3.7 cm in the congenital group and 5.7+/-2.9 cm in the acquired group; this difference was not statistically significant (P> .05). Lengthening percentage was significantly higher in the congenital group (25+/-17.6) than in the acquired group (19+/-15.4). The increase in the complications rate in congenital limb-length discrepancy correlates with a significantly higher lengthening percentage. Bone regenerate is produced equally regardless of whether the etiology is acquired or congenital.
Medical subject headings
- Leg Length Inequality
- Osteogenesis, Distraction