Inferior survival of hydroxyapatite versus titanium-coated cups at 15 years.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19330391.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s11999-009-0796-8 and PMC identifier 2758968.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Hydroxyapatite (HA) particles have long been suspected to disintegrate from implant surfaces, become entrapped in joint spaces of orthopaedic bearing couples, and start a cascade leading to progressive polyethylene (PE) wear, increased osteolysis, and aseptic loosening. We compared cup revision at 15 years' followup in a randomized group of patients with 26 cementless THA components with titanium (Ti) versus first-generation HA coating. We also assessed radiographic PE wear and osteolysis to the 12-year followup or end point revision at a minimum of 5 years (mean, 10.9 years; range, 5-12.6 years). Two Ti-coated cups (17%) and eight HA-coated cups (57%) were revised at 15 years' followup. Femoral head penetration rate was 0.46 mm/year (standard deviation, 0.26) with the HA-coated cups (n = 12) and 0.38 mm/year (standard deviation, 0.14) with the Ti-coated cups (n = 10); we observed a wide variance of linear wear with the HA-coated cups. We also observed a positive association between high wear rate and revision, and between a high volume of osteolysis and revision. Our findings suggest inferior survival of medium-thickness spray-dried HA-coated cups with individual cases of excessive PE wear and premature cup failure. These findings apply to first-generation modular cups and may not apply to other cup designs and new HA-coating technologies. Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Durapatite
- Hip Prosthesis
- Joint Instability
- Titanium
Anatomy
- hip