10 years of NICE: still growing and still controversial.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19341973.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70077-4.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) will have existed for 10 years on April 1, 2009. Over the past decade, the institute's methodological approach to the development of guidance and assessment of the value of health-care interventions has received international interest and acclaim. Furthermore, individual decisions, in particular those made on new cancer drugs, have generated enormous controversy. An early example was the appraisal of irinotecan and oxaliplatin for colorectal cancer in 2002. In 2003, NICE described the rationale behind its decision making. The 10th anniversary of the institute provides an opportunity to review some of the key issues affecting cancer appraisals and to explain the development of other NICE guidance programmes relevant to the provision of cancer services.
Medical subject headings
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Health Planning Guidelines
- National Health Programs
- Neoplasms
- Technology Assessment, Biomedical