Moving from bag to catheter for urine collection in non-toilet-trained children suspected of having urinary tract infection: a paired comparison of urine cultures.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19375715.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.01.008.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare, in the same children, urine culture results from bag- versus catheter-obtained specimens with catheter culture as the reference. A total of 192 non-toilet-trained children <3 years of age from 2 emergency departments were recruited for this prospective cross-sectional study. All had positive urinalysis results from bag-obtained specimens that were systematically checked with a catheter-obtained specimen before treatment. Results of comparison of urine cultures obtained with these 2 collecting methods are presented. A total of 7.5% of bag-obtained specimen positive cultures had false-positive results. Twenty-nine percent of bag-obtained specimen cultures with negative results were false negative. Altogether, bag-obtained specimens led to either a misdiagnosis or an impossible diagnosis in 40% of cases versus 5.7% when urethral catheterization was used. Every bag-obtained positive-result urinalysis should be confirmed with a more reliable method before therapy.
Medical subject headings
- Specimen Handling
- Urinary Catheterization
- Urinary Tract Infections
- Urine