Long-term quality of life after hepatic resection: health is not simply the absence of disease.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19384460.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00268-009-0032-4.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Due to advances in operative methods and perioperative care, mortality and morbidity following major hepatic resection have decreased substantially, making long-term quality of life (QoL) an increasingly prominent issue. We evaluated whether postoperative diagnosis was associated with long-term QoL and health in patients requiring hepatic surgery for benign or malignant disease. QoL was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 and the liver-specific QLQ-LMC21 module. Between 2002 and 2006, 249 patients underwent hepatic surgery for malignant (76%) and benign (24%) conditions. One hundred thirty-five patients were available for QoL analysis after a mean of 26.5 months. There was no statistical difference in global QoL scores between patients with malignant and benign diseases (p = 0.367). Neither the extent of the resection (> or =2 segments vs. <2 segments; p = 0.975; OR = 0.988; 95% CI = 0.461-2.119) nor patient age had a significant influence on overall QoL (p = 0.092). These results indicate that long-term QoL for patients who underwent liver resection for malignant disease is quite good and that a poor clinical prognosis does not seem to correlate with a poor QoL.
Medical subject headings
- Hepatectomy
- Liver Neoplasms
- Quality of Life
- Sickness Impact Profile