Analysis of wear in retrieved mobile and fixed bearing knee inserts.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 19427754.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2009.03.010.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
One purported advantage for mobile bearing (MB) knee implants is reduced polyethylene wear. Twenty-three retrieved Low Contact Stress (LCS) MB and 31 Anatomic Modular Knee (AMK) fixed bearing tibial polyethylene inserts, both Enduron (Depuy, Warsaw, IN) and sterilized by gas plasma, were graded for top and backside wear using the Hood grading system. For articular surface wear, there was no statistical difference between pitting and scratching, but burnishing was twice as much for MB inserts (P = .003). For backside scores, there was a minimal amount of pitting for both, but the scratching score was twice (P = .000) and the burnishing score was 3 times greater for MB inserts (P = .000). At more than 5 years in situ, the linear wear measurements were similar for the 2 groups (mean penetration was 0.329 mm for MB and 0.320 mm for fixed bearing).
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Equipment Failure Analysis
- Knee Prosthesis
- Polyethylene
- Prosthesis Failure
Anatomy
- knee